|
[left.htm]
| |
Eight killers were executed in
February 2009. They had murdered at least 14 people.
Three
killers expired while awaiting execution in February 2009.
They had murdered at least 7 people.
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 4, 2009 |
Texas |
Carolina Prado, 37
Eric Prado, 14 |
David Martinez |
executed |
|
Late on the evening of July 10, 1994, 11-year-old Belinda Prado was
watching television on the living room couch of the home she shared
with her mother Carolina and her 14-year-old brother Eric. Eric fell
asleep on a mattress on the floor in the living room while Carolina
slept in her bedroom. Later that night, David Martinez, who had been
staying with Carolina, and another man whom Belinda had never seen
before came to her home. The other man left after 15-20 minutes, and
Belinda saw Martinez go to her mother’s bedroom. Early on the
morning of July 11, 1994, Belinda awoke to the sound of a baseball
bat striking something in the living room. Belinda saw Martinez, who
was dressed only in a pair of boxer shorts, repeatedly strike Eric
in the head with a baseball bat. Belinda saw blood flying as
Martinez beat Eric with the bat. When Belinda asked Martinez “to
behave,” he told her to be quiet or he would kill her, too. Fearful
for her life, Belinda asked where her mother was and he replied
Carolina was in the shower. When Belinda looked in the bathroom,
however, she did not see her mother. Martinez forced Belinda into
Eric’s bedroom at knife-point and tied her to the bed. Martinez was
dressed in a white shirt, a pair of black pants, a leather vest
Belinda recognized as belonging to her uncle, and a pair of boots.
Before leaving the house, he gave Belinda a handwritten note and
directed her to take the note to her grandmother, who lived a short
distance down the street. Martinez’s handwritten note, which was
admitted into evidence at trial, read “I messed up. I'LL Be at the
Friends on the EAst side.” Still fearful for her life, Belinda
waited several minutes after Martinez left the house before she took
his note to her grandparents’ home. Belinda gave her grandmother the
note and accompanied her grandparents back to her home, where she
learned her mother was dead in her bedroom. Carolina Prado’s mother,
Rosa Ramirez, testified at trial that she first met Martinez in June
1994, when Carolina introduced him to her and informed her mother
she and Martinez were going to live together. Carolina was divorced
from Eric and Belinda’s father, with whom the two children had
stayed for several weeks prior to date of the murders. Around 5:10
a.m. on the morning of the murders, Martinez telephoned her and
informed her Carolina was tired and did not plan to go to work that
day. Around 8:30 a.m. the same morning, Belinda rang her door bell
and, when she answered the door, Belinda, who appeared nervous,
handed her the note and told her Eric had a lot of blood on his
head. As she and Belinda walked down to Carolina’s house, Belinda
told her Carolina was at work. When they arrived at Carolina’s home,
Belinda directed her to go inside but Belinda refused to enter the
house. The grandmother entered the house and walked into the living
room, where she found Eric lying dead with a towel covering his
head. When she lifted the towel, she observed that Eric’s head was
“broken,” his brains were “all over the place,” and there was “lots
of blood.” After her husband entered the house and observed Eric,
they walked back to their home where her husband called 911 and then
called Carolina’s place of employment. By the time they returned to
Carolina’s home, a police officer had sealed the house and would not
allow them to enter. The officer told her there was a dead woman in
the back bedroom. Mrs. Ramirez noticed drops of blood on the
curtains and window of Carolina’s bedroom; she never again saw
Carolina. San Antonio Police Officers who arrived at the scene found
Eric lying dead from obvious head injuries in the living room and
Carolina dead from even more gruesome head injuries in the
blood-drenched bedroom. Police officers also found what appeared to
be a bloody baseball bat covered by a towel on a living room chair.
An autopsy established Carolina Prado sustained a large contusion on
her right shoulder and arm, a bruise on the back of her elbow,
bruising of the eyelids secondary to a massive skull fracture, and
the right side of her head caved in due to blunt trauma; suffered
multiple fractures in all areas of the skull, including behind the
eye and at the base of the skull; suffered a massive multi-rayed
laceration on the right side of her head with multiple loose
fragments of skull; lost approximate one-half of her brain tissue
from her cranial cavity due to massive blunt force trauma and died
as a result of multiple, massive skull fractures and severe
underlying brain injuries. An autopsy established Eric Prado had
sustained a large contusion above and behind the right ear
accompanied by a large laceration due to bony skull fragments and
brain matter protruding from the defect, as well two smaller
lacerations just behind the larger one; suffered a hinge fracture
laterally across the base of the brain from ear to ear. Eric was
likely rendered unconscious immediately and died almost immediately
after he was assaulted. He received “a tremendous blow” by something
heavy. Eric did not show any sign of defensive injuries and died as
a result of cranial cerebral injuries, including severe fractures of
the skull and severe underlying brain injuries. At approximately
3:30 a.m. on July 13, 1994, San Marcos Police Officers arrested
Martinez on a capital murder warrant at the residence of his
grandmother. Upon his arrest, Martinez repeatedly gave police a
fictitious name even after they discovered his identification in his
back pocket and noted the identifying tattoos on his arm. Following
his arrest, while police were examining a baseball bat they found in
the bedroom where he had been arrested, Martinez volunteered a
comment along the lines of “that’s not what you’re looking for” or
“that’s not it.” During the brief drive to the Hays County Law
Enforcement Center, Martinez asked if he were going to San Antonio
that night and, when the officer driving the vehicle indicated
negatively, Martinez volunteered that he had known there were police
officers outside watching the house and that he could have done
something if he had wished to do so. He inquired “who ratted on me?”
and, when the officer driving the vehicle responded the matter was
in the papers, Martinez sat up straight, appeared to be proud, and
later volunteered “I killed them just like cockroaches.” Much later
on the morning of July 13, 1994, a pair of San Antonio Police
homicide detectives traveled to San Marcos to interview Martinez but
were forced to wait several hours while Martinez went before a local
magistrate. While they waited, the two detectives went to the
residence where Martinez had been arrested and obtained consent from
Martinez’s grandmother and uncle to search the residence. They took
custody of a backpack his grandmother indicated belonged to
Martinez, a Dallas Cowboys baseball cap and a pair of tennis shoes,
both of which Belinda testified belonged to her brother Eric, and a
shirt and pair of trousers Martinez’s uncle indicated belonged to
Martinez. Inside the backpack, the detectives found a black leather
vest which Belinda testified at trial belonged to one of her uncles.
The San Antonio homicide detectives returned to the Hays County Law
Enforcement Center and interviewed Martinez. Martinez agreed to be
interviewed and signed a waiver of his rights. In his written
confession, Martinez stated, "I want to talk to you about what I
remember about the murder of Carol Prado and Eric Prado, 231
Obregon, San Antonio, Texas, on Monday, July the 11th, 1994. I have
been dating Carol for about two months. I had drank a 12-pack of Bud
Light beer, a big bottle of Bacardi rum. I got off work at Handy
Andy at 1:45 a.m., and I walked to Carole’s house. I am living with
Carole, and when I got home I started drinking. I got home about
1:50 a.m. When I got there, Carole was awake. Eric was asleep in the
living room on a mattress on the floor. Belinda was on the couch
also in the living room. Belinda was awake. I had a friend of mine
there but I don’t want to tell you who he is. I walked my friend
down the street at about 3:00 a.m., and I returned a short time
later. I went outside and drank more, and then I walked down the
street and threw the bottle. I went back in the house at 5:10 a.m. I
was freaking and tripping and I hit Carole for no reason. I picked
up a baseball bat that I tripped on. It was wooden. I hit Carole in
the head with the bat. I must have hit her a lot to make her pass
away. When I came in at 5:10 a.m., she told me to call her mom and
tell her mom that she was going to stay home with the kids and would
not be going to work. After I hit Carole, I went back to the living
room and put the bat on the side of the couch, and I sat on the
couch. Belinda was half awake and half asleep. Belinda wanted
to go see her mother, and I told Belinda not to go in the bedroom
because Carole was in the shower. I didn’t want Belinda to see her
mother. I told Belinda to lay down and go to sleep. I thought I saw
Eric coming at me, so I grabbed the bat and hit him in the head. I
realized he was still laying on the floor. I stood up and hit Eric
about four times with the same bat. I looked at Eric and said to
myself, What the f*ck AM I doing. I then tied Belinda’s hands in
front of her with a tie. I told her to go to her grandmother’s house
after I left. I tied her hands loosely. Belinda asked me what she
was supposed to tell her grandmother. I then wrote a note that said
“I messed up. I’LL be on the Friends at the EAst side.” I gave
Belinda the note. I then left and went to a friend's house on the
east side of San Antonio. I told him what I had done and I asked my
friend to just put a bullet in my head. I can't give you my friend’s
name. I don’t know why I hit Carole and Eric. Carole had told me
when I came home that she had seen me talking to a lady at Handy
Andy but we didn’t argue. I understand my rights and I am waiving my
rights and I am giving this statement because I want to. My
statement is true and correct and this happened in San Antonio,
Bexar County, Texas." Martinez wrote the following appendix to his
confession in his own handwriting: "I feel for the actions I took,
I'm requesting the only just sentence for me is the “Death Penalty.”
I took a life of someone who I cared about a lot. I feel that I can
never bring her back. Please, give me the Death Penalty!! I'll never
forget Carol. The pain swells within my heart forever. Carol,
wherever you are please forgive me. I Do Love you!!" The prosecution
presented testimony from a forensic documents examiner establishing
the same person who wrote the final paragraph of Martinez’s
handwritten confession had also written the note Martinez gave to
Belinda Prado on the date of the murders. Defense counsel presented
no evidence. After deliberating slightly more than an hour, the jury
returned its verdict finding Martinez guilty of capital murder. In
the punishment phase of the trial, a police officer from Pharr,
Texas, testified regarding his arrest of Martinez on September 19,
1988, while Martinez was burglarizing a convenience store. A Hidalgo
County juvenile probation officer testified Martinez was charged
with six counts of burglary committed June through September 1988.
Martinez received a one-year probated sentence on December 13, 1988
and was arrested less than a week later for another burglary.
Martinez once threatened the officer’s life, and was committed to
the custody of the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) on January 30, 1989.
A former TYC case manager who met weekly with Martinez during his
subsequent stay at a TYC-contract facility testified that Martinez
became enraged, threw his chair, and broke a 50-gallon aquarium in
March 1989, when she denied his request for a furlough to visit his
mother. He briefly escaped in June 1989. Martinez habitually tried
to stare down anyone who would not do what he wanted and was a
“manipulator” who frequently tried to “sweet talk” her but would try
to intimidate her if he did not get what he wanted. She said
Martinez had a problem with authority figures, often talked back to
officials at his TYC facility, had trouble controlling his temper
and aggressive impulses. She said Martinez was intelligent, as
demonstrated by his completion of his GED while under TYC
supervision, and was discharged from the TYC in May, 1990. A McAllen
shoe store employee testified Martinez entered her store on the
morning of May 30, 1990 and waited until a courier left the store,
then followed her to the back of the store where he grabbed her
around the neck and waist and held her tightly against him while she
screamed and fought unsuccessfully for her freedom. Martinez said he
“wanted to be alone” with her and touched her breast and buttocks,
then told her to stop yelling and pulled her down to the floor,
injuring her back in the process. He finally released her only after
she begged him not to hurt her and convinced him she was pregnant.
He left the store only after she promised not to call the police and
begged him to leave, and he threatened to return if she called the
police. The store clerk also testified she saw Martinez walking
along a city street on July 9, 1990, and identified him as her
assailant when police brought him to her store later that same day.
Martinez was subsequently charged with attempted sexual assault. A
former Hidalgo County adult probation officer testified that
Martinez received a probated 10-year sentence in May 1991, following
his conviction for attempted sexual assault. The conditions of
Martinez’s probation included making financial contributions,
reporting weekly, and participating in a weekly sex offender group
program. In early July, 1991, Martinez stopped reporting weekly,
stopped attending weekly group counseling sessions, and ceased
working or making his required financial contributions. After
several months of unsuccessful attempts to contact Martinez, he
filed a motion to revoke probation in December 1991. When law
enforcement officers went to execute the warrant for Martinez’s
arrest, he fled and was later charged with evading arrest. Martinez
pleaded “true” to the motion to revoke and was sentenced to serve a
5-year prison term. A McAllen police officer testified that he
assisted in the arrest of Martinez on April 1, 1992, on the motion
to revoke probation. When officers announced their presence at the
front door of Martinez’s residence, he fled out the back door.
Martinez then led several officers on a chase through several
backyards, over fences, and through alleyways before catching him
several blocks away. A Texas Department of Criminal Justice parole
supervisor testified that Martinez was paroled December 2, 1992. The
conditions of Martinez’s parole included mandatory participation in
psychological sex offender counseling and making three face-to-face
reports to his parole officer each month. A parole revocation was
issued September 10, 1993, based on Martinez’s failure to attend sex
offender counseling. Following Martinez’s arrest for capital murder,
he waived both preliminary and final revocation hearings and
admitted he was guilty of capital murder. Five Bexar County Adult
Detention Center officers testified regarding a series of incidents
in which Martinez violated the rules of that facility or otherwise
engaged in violent misconduct. More specifically, those officers
testified: (1) on November 19, 1994, Martinez cursed and threatened
a detention officer while the officer was escorting him to a visit;
(2) on April 14, 1995, Martinez shouted and kicked a food tray out
of the food slot under his cell door, spilling food across the
floor; (3) on May 27, 1995, Martinez disobeyed a verbal order to
stop changing the channel on a television and, when an officer wrote
him up for that rule violation, profanely threatened to harm that
officer’s family; (4) Martinez engaged in a verbal altercation with
another inmate over the television during which Martinez assumed a
fighter’s stance and had to be restrained by detention officers
before blows were exchanged between the inmates; and (5) on or about
August 21, 1995, Martinez attempted to assert “tank boss” status by
demanding other inmates pay him with food for the privilege of using
the telephone. A Hidalgo County psychologist who had attempted to
treat Martinez in a sex offender program in 1991 testified Martinez:
(1) was not a successful participant in the program because he would
not often attend group sessions and, even when he did, he refused to
divulge any information about himself, (2) showed a lack of
progression throughout his life, (3) displayed a defiant refusal to
admit he had a problem, which makes Martinez dangerous, (4)
displayed an extremely poor ability to empathize with others,
especially in situations in which dominance or control is an issue,
which also makes Martinez dangerous, (5) showed no sign of having
sustained any neurological injury or brain damage, (6) tested well
above average on one intelligence test, (7) suffers from an
antisocial personality, i.e., Martinez demonstrates a pervasive,
non-flexible pattern of behavior characterized by the disregard for,
and violation of, the rights of others, (8) Martinez’s antisocial
personality manifests itself through his persistent unlawful
conduct, deceitfulness, impulsiveness, irritability, aggressiveness,
irresponsibility, and lack of remorse for his misconduct, (9) is not
mentally ill, (10) displays a powerful sex drive directed toward
children, (11) refused to admit he had sexually assaulted the shoe
store clerk even after he had pleaded guilty to that offense, and
(12) poses an obvious danger to society. Finally, a court bailiff
testified that on October 10, 1995, Martinez demanded to be placed
in handcuffs because, otherwise, he was going to “go off” on his
attorney and two days later, Martinez threatened a prosecutor during
a heated exchange before the trial judge. On October 30, 1995, the
jury returned a verdict recommending a death sentence. UPDATE:
"Nothing I can say can ever change the past," David Martinez said
from the death chamber gurney. "Asking for forgiveness or saying I'm
sorry is not going to change anything. I hope you can find peace
from all the pain I've caused you all these years." Martinez looked
at friends and relatives and told them that he loved them, advising
them to "keep on going and it will be OK." As the drugs began taking
effect, he mouthed, "I'm sorry. I truly am." He shook his head
vigorously, raising it up from the gurney pillow and then closed his
eyes. He was pronounced dead at 6:18 p.m., eight minutes after the
lethal drugs began to flow. Among the witnesses was Belinda Prado,
who was 10 when she witnessed the murders of her mother and brother.
An uncle held her as she watched Martinez die and she had to use a
wheelchair to leave the witness room. |
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 4, 2009 |
Tennessee |
Fred Stafford Edna
Stafford |
Steve Henley |
executed |
|
Fred and Edna Stafford, an elderly couple, lived
on Pine Lick Creek Road in Jackson County, just a short distance
from the farm, owned by Steve Henley’s family, where his grandmother
lived. On the day of the Staffords’ death, July 24, 1985, Steve
Henley had visited his grandmother and obtained some mechanical
parts for some work he was doing. Co-defendant Terry Flatt was with
him. Earlier in the day they had been driving about, tending to
business affairs of Henley’s. During that time they had consumed
some beer and also had taken some drugs, referred to in the record
as Dilaudids. According to Flatt, as they passed the Staffords’
residence Henley commented, “there was some people that lived on
that road that owed his grandmother or grandfather some money, and
they done him wrong, his grandparents wrong years before, and he was
going to stop and see about collecting some money off them.” Henley
let Flatt out of the truck just before he reached his grandmother’s
house. When he returned five or ten minutes later he had a .22 rifle
with him. They stopped fifty or seventy-five yards up the road where
Henley loaded some more shells into the rifle. He also filled a
plastic jug with gasoline from a five-gallon can he had in the back
of the truck. They proceeded on toward the Stafford residence. When
they reached there Mr. and Mrs. Stafford were standing on the
left-hand side of the road looking at a small bridge where some
construction work had recently been done. Henley stopped the truck,
jumped out and told them, “I want your money, if you don’t give it
to me this man in the truck here, he’s going to kill me.” He then
directed them to go to the house. Fred said, “Steve, if you want
money or something, I got $80, maybe $100, you can have it.” He
forced them on to the house at gunpoint and told Flatt to bring the
.22 rifle as he followed behind them. When they got within 20 or 30
feet of the house he told Flatt to give him the rifle and go back to
the truck and get the plastic jug of gasoline. Flatt did as
directed. As he reached the porch he saw Henley begin to shoot. He
first shot Fred then turned and shot Edna a time or two. While she
was laying on the floor moaning and groaning he threw the rifle to
Flatt, took out his pistol and shot her again with the pistol. He
told Flatt to pour out some of the gas. Flatt endeavored to do as he
was told and poured out a small amount. When he could not finish,
Henley took the container of gas from him and finished pouring it
out. He then directed Flatt to light it. When Flatt said he could
not, he struck the match and as the flames went up they ran to the
truck. The house burned to the ground. The bodies of the Staffords
were found in the ashes. All that remained of Fred’s body was part
of the right leg and the trunk area. The body of Edna Stafford was
similarly burned. It was determined that Fred died from a gunshot
wound to the chest with the bullet passing through his heart. Edna’s
death was caused by burns and inhalation of noxious gases from the
fire. It was the opinion of the medical examiner that Edna lived a
minute or longer after the fire began. In 1986, a Tennessee jury
convicted Henley of two counts of first-degree murder and one count
of aggravated arson. The jury recommended a death sentence. The
trial court sentenced Henley to death for each murder and to twenty
years imprisonment for the aggravated arson conviction.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 10, 2009 |
Texas |
Wendie Prescott, 22
Christine Vu, 25 |
Dale
Scheanette |
executed |
|
On Christmas Eve of 1996, Norman and Brenda
Norwood became worried about their 22-year-old niece, Wendie
Prescott, a teaching assistant, when she failed to show-up for a
planned shopping trip with her sister. Around 11:00 p.m., Norman
went to Wendie's apartment, only to discover her naked body lying
face down in a partially filled bathtub. Her neck, hands and feet
were tied in duct tape, which trailed from her neck down behind her
back to her hands and feet. The medical examiner believed that she
had been bound in this fashion prior to death. The autopsy revealed
that Wendie had been manually strangled, with the possibility that
her immersion in the tub also played a role in her death. A sexual
assault examination was conducted and sperm samples collected and
preserved for DNA testing. Though investigators found a high-quality
dust print at the apartment, initial comparisons yielded no matches.
In 1999, DNA evidence from the murder was matched to evidence from a
sexual assault at the University of Texas at Arlington and from a
rape in Grand Prairie. In the summer of 2000, the print from
Wendie's apartment was resubmitted to the FBI computer system,
which, through the use of new technology, was able to narrow the
list of possible matches. One of the matches scored over 2500
points, almost 1000 points more than the next highest score. A FBI
analyst concluded the print found in Wendie's apartment matched the
known print of Dale Devon Scheanette who had been arrested for a De
Soto burglary in March, 1999. It was Scheanette's first arrest, so
it was the first time he was fingerprinted and entered into the FBI
database. After obtaining a search warrant, officers obtained saliva
samples from Scheanette. DNA testing matched the DNA extracted from
these samples to the DNA extracted from Wendie Prescott's corpse
with a statistical certainty of one in 763 million. At the
punishment phase of Scheanette's trial, the State connected
Scheanette to yet another capital murder, that of 26-year-old
teacher, Christine Vu. Three months before Wendie's murder,
Christine's body was found bound with duct tape, naked and in a
half-filled bathtub in the same apartment complex that Wendie lived
in, The Peartree Apartments. Scheanette lived in the same complex
but moved out before Wendie's murder, had no criminal record and no
connection to either victim, so he was not considered a suspect. The
State also tied Scheanette to five brutal sexual assaults. The State
also introduced evidence that, while incarcerated awaiting trial,
jail guards found concealed in Scheanette's cell a contraband
triangular piece of plexiglass that could have been used as a
weapon. Finally, the State introduced evidence of a burglary
conviction from 1999. During the punishment phase, various family
members and a chaplain testified on Scheanette's behalf. In January
2003, a Texas jury deliberated for an hour and a half before they
convicted Scheanette of capital murder and sentenced him to death
for the murder of Wendie Prescott while in the course of committing
or attempting to commit sexual assault on her. Prosecutors
began the punishment phase with testimony from women whom Scheanette
is accused of raping. Authorities say DNA evidence links him to
their assaults. One woman described how the sound of breathing in
her Grand Prairie apartment in October 1999 awakened her. She
testified that a man raped her at gunpoint. "I was pregnant," the
woman testified. "I prayed for God not to forsake me." As her
attacker was leaving, she asked him why he raped her. "He said, 'I
don't know. I'm mad at the world,' " she testified. Another woman
described a brutal rape at her Lancaster apartment in December 1998.
The woman testified that she fought back, which enraged her attacker
enough that he kicked down her bedroom door. Her 2-year-old son
pleaded with the man, "Let my mom go!" as he slapped the man's legs,
she testified. Scheanette also raped a police officer at her
Lancaster apartment. The officer told jurors that she was in uniform
at a gas station in 1995 or 1996 when Scheanette befriended her and
said he lived in a nearby Lancaster apartment complex. She testified
that the two spoke several times by phone over the next six months
but never dated, because she "had a bad vibe." Scheanette often
referred to himself as a "jack of all trades" during their
conversations, she testified. In October 1998, as her attacker used
her handcuffs to restrain her after he assaulted her, she asked him
how he got into her apartment. "He said he was a 'jack of all
trades,' " the woman testified. "When I heard that, I thought, 'Was
that him?' " She later told authorities about the connection.
Members of Christine's family said they were pleased with the guilty
verdict. "The person responsible has been convicted," her brother,
Hiep Vu, said. "We feel he is responsible for Christine's murder as
well. We've waited six years for this." Thang Khuu waited six years
to face the man accused of raping and killing his fiancée —
Christine Vu, a third-grade teacher at Morton Elementary School in
Arlington. "I want the guy to look me in the eye and to see what he
did to me," said Khuu, who still carries a photo of Christine in his
wallet. "I have waited to see someone go through a trial for this.
The crime is unforgivable." Thang Khuu found Christine's body in
their apartment, and was questioned as a possible suspect. He
volunteered to provide hair and saliva samples for DNA testing and
was cleared. At Morton Elementary School in Arlington, where Vu
taught for several years, fellow teacher JoAnna Robbins still
wonders why her friend was killed. Scheanette's arrest did not erase
the pain but brought a sense of closure, Robbins said. This case was
profiled on an episode of A&E's
Cold Case Files.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 10, 2009 |
Alabama |
Lester
Edward Dodd Pamela Dodd William A. Nelson, Sr. James
Watkins Florence Adell Elliott |
Steven Pilley |
Died in prison |
|
Alabama death row inmate Stephen Pilley died in prison of
a liver ailment. The Alabama Department of Corrections said Pilley
was transported to North Baldwin Infirmary in Bay Minette on Feb. 3,
suffering from end-stage liver disease and Pilley died on February
10, 2009. Pilley was one of two men sentenced to death in the 1994
execution-style shooting murders of five people at the Changing
Times Lounge in Birmingham. On the morning of October 16, 1994, the
bodies of Lester Edward Dodd, Pamela Dodd, William A. Nelson, Sr.,
James Watkins, and Florence Adell Elliott were found in the Changing
Times Lounge, a neighborhood bar, in Birmingham. The Dodds, who
worked at the bar, were found lying facedown in the pool-table area
of the lounge, while the other three, who were regular bar patrons,
were found lying facedown in the bar area. The positions of the
bodies suggested an 'execution style' killing. All five died from
gunshot wounds to the top or back of the head, inflicted by two
distinctive types of handgun ammunition: .25 caliber CTI Blazer
bullets and 9mm Glazer bullets. A forensic expert testified that,
while no guns were ever recovered, he was certain that two weapons
had been used in these murders. The bar had been ransacked, the cash
register emptied, and the personal effects of the victims scattered
around the bar. A bartender at the Crazy Eights Bar in Bessemer
testified that, around 7:00 p.m. on October 15, 1994, while working
in the bar, he overheard Stephen Pilley and Andrew Apicella
discussing a way to make some 'easy money.' The bartender testified
that he heard Pilley tell Apicella that he did not have a gun, and
Apicella responded by telling him he could get guns. Shortly after
this conversation, Pilley and Apicella left the Crazy Eights Bar. A
number of customers who had been at the Changing Times Lounge at
various times the night of October 15, 1994, identified Pilley as
having been in the bar that night with another male. These witnesses
remembered Pilley and his friend because they were not regular
customers and because either Pilley or his friend approached a
regular customer at the jukebox, requesting that she play a
particular song. While Pilley's friend was playing pool, Pilley
would wander about the bar. The last of these witnesses to leave the
bar testified that when he left at approximately 12:30 a.m., Pilley
and his friend were still in the bar with about five other customers
and the Dodds. Rhonda Haynes, a friend of Pilley's, testified that,
after she had gone to bed on the night of October 15, 1994, Pilley
and Andrew Apicella came to her house unannounced, and asked her to
arrange for a motel room where they could spend the night. They
stayed with her until daybreak, injecting each other with a cocaine
solution. During that stay, Haynes helped the two men count and
divide money they claimed to have won at a bar playing pool. From
this money, Pilley handed Haynes five $2 bills, asking her to hold
them for him. Pamela Haddix, who lived with one of the victims,
William A. Nelson, Sr., testified that it was their custom to save
$2 bills to give to their grandchildren as gifts. Ms. Haddix
testified that, at the time of his death, Mr. Nelson had five $2
bills folded in a 'secret pocket' in his wallet. A lawyer, retained
by the Apicella family on an unrelated matter, turned over to police
jewelry that was subsequently identified as belonging to Pamela
Dodd. Sgt. Johnny Long, a Birmingham Police Department homicide
detective, was the lead investigator of the murders at the Changing
Times Lounge. During his investigation, Sgt. Long interviewed Pilley
several times. Pilley initially told Sgt. Long that the last time he
had gone to the Changing Times Lounge was more than a month before
the killings. However, in subsequent interviews, Pilley told Sgt.
Long that he had, in fact, been in the lounge on the night of the
killings, but he claimed that he went there alone and that he left
before 11:00 p.m. Finally, Pilley told Sgt. Long that he had been in
the Changing Times Lounge with Andrew Apicella, who was his
accomplice, but he denied knowing Apicella or participating in the
robbery-homicides of the five victims. As a result of Sgt. Long's
investigation, he arrested two people -- Pilley and Apicella -- and
charged them with capital murder. Sgt. Long testified that he
advised Pilley of his rights under Miranda before interviewing him.
Pilley elected to waive those rights and answer questions. At trial,
Pilley denied any knowledge of Apicella's plan to rob and murder the
customers and employees of the Changing Times Lounge. Pilley claimed
that Apicella had threatened him and his family if he told the
police what had happened. Pilley's version of the events surrounding
the murders was detailed, but somewhat inconsistent. However, Pilley
did not blame the inconsistencies on intoxication. Rather, Pilley
claimed that he had not told the police the facts to which he now
testified because, at the time of his interviews, he did not believe
this information to be relevant to the investigation. Pilley also
denied using cocaine at Rhonda Haynes's house following the murders.
He maintained that he filled his syringe with water, rather than a
cocaine solution. After both sides had rested and the circuit court
had instructed the jury on the law applicable to Pilley's case, the
jury determined that the murders of the Dodds, Nelson, Watkins, and
Elliott were committed pursuant to a common scheme or plan, and it
convicted Pilley of capital murder. Andrew Apicella was likewise
convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for his role in
this offense. During the penalty phase of Pilley's trial, the State
resubmitted all of the evidence it had introduced during the guilt
phase. Pilley presented no evidence. After both sides had rested and
the circuit court had instructed the jury on the law applicable to
the penalty phase, the jury returned an advisory verdict
recommending that Pilley be sentenced to death.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
Feburary 11, 2009 |
Florida |
Lisa DeCarr, 15 |
Wayne
Tompkins |
executed |
|
The victim, Lisa
DeCarr, aged 15, disappeared from her home in Tampa on March 24,
1983. In June 1984, Lisa's skeletal remains were found in a
shallow grave under the house along with her pink bathrobe and
jewelry. Based upon a ligature (apparently the sash of her
bathrobe) that was found tied tightly around her neck bones, the
medical examiner determined that Lisa had been strangled to
death. In September 1984, Wayne Tompkins, Lisa's mother's
boyfriend, was charged with the murder. At trial, the state's
three key witnesses testified as follows. Barbara DeCarr, Lisa's
mother, testified that she left the house on the morning of
March 24, 1983, at approximately 9 a.m., leaving Lisa alone in
the house. Lisa was dressed in her pink bathrobe. Barbara met
Wayne Tompkins at his mother's house a few blocks away. Some
time that morning, she sent Tompkins back to her house to get
some newspapers for packing. When Tompkins returned, he told
Barbara that Lisa was watching television in her robe. Tompkins
then left his mother's house again, and Barbara did not see or
speak to him again until approximately 3 o'clock that afternoon.
At that time, Tompkins told Barbara that Lisa had run away. He
said the last time he saw Lisa, she was going to the store and
was wearing jeans and a blouse. Barbara returned to the Osborne
Street house where she found Lisa's pocketbook and robe missing
but not the clothes described by Tompkins. Barbara then called
the police. The state's next witness, Kathy Stevens, a close
friend of the victim, testified that she had gone to Lisa
DeCarr's house at approximately 9 a.m. on the morning of March
24, 1983. After hearing a loud crash, Stevens opened the front
door and saw Lisa on the couch struggling and hitting Tompkins
who was on top of her attempting to remove her clothing. Lisa
asked her to call the police. At that point, Stevens left the
house but did not call the police. When Stevens returned later
to retrieve her purse, Tompkins answered the door and told her
that Lisa had left with her mother. Stevens also testified that
Tompkins had made sexual advances towards Lisa on two prior
occasions. The final key state's witness testified that Tompkins
confided details of the murder to him while they were cellmates
in June 1985. The man testified that Tompkins told him that Lisa
was on the sofa when he returned to the house to get some
newspapers for packing. When Tompkins tried to force himself on
her, Lisa kicked him in the groin. Tompkins then strangled her
and buried her under the house along with her pocketbook and
some clothing (jeans and a top) to make it appear as if she had
run away.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 12, 2009 |
Texas |
Leah Joette Smith
unnamed victim unnamed victim |
Johnny
Johnson |
executed |
|
Johnny Ray Johnson was convicted and sentenced to
death for the March 27, 1995 capital murder of Leah Joette Smith
during an aggravated sexual assault. The State presented evidence,
including Johnson’s confession, that Johnson offered to give
Joette Smith,
who was addicted to crack cocaine, some crack cocaine in exchange
for sex. After Joette smoked the crack, she refused to have sex with
Johnson. He became angry and grabbed her, ripped her clothing off,
and threw her to the ground. When she fought back with a wooden
board, Johnson repeatedly struck her head against the cement curb.
After he hit her head against the cement three or four times, she
stopped fighting. He then sexually assaulted her. During the
assault, Joette told Johnson that he had better enjoy it because she
was going to file rape charges against him. Johnson confessed that
he got very angry when she hit him with the board and that it was
“like something in my head was just saying “‘KILL, KILL, KILL.’”
After sexually assaulting Joette, Johnson stomped on her face five or
six times. He walked away, but realized that he had left his wallet
at the scene, so he returned. In his confession, he stated that when
he saw Joette’s body face up and naked, he sexually assaulted her
again and then picked up his wallet and her boots and left her
there on the ground to die. Joette Smith sustained numerous severe injuries to her mouth, face,
head, and neck: her teeth were knocked out, her tongue was
displaced, both sides of her jaw bone were fractured, and she
sustained scalp lacerations and a subdural hematoma. The medical
examiner testified that Joette died as a result of swallowing her own
blood that had accumulated in the back part of her throat when her
jaw bones were fractured. He testified that the subdural hematoma
also contributed to her death, but that she could have survived it
had she received prompt medical attention. The medical examiner
testified that Joette Smith did not die instantly, because it takes a while
for the blood to accumulate in the back of the throat. The jury
convicted Johnson for Joette Smith’s brutal murder. Then at the punishment
phase, the jury heard the State’s evidence of Johnson’s extensive
criminal history, beginning in 1975, including numerous other brutal
sexual assaults and murders. Johnson’s niece Elizabeth
testified that when she was eight or nine years old, Johnson asked
her to walk to a store in Houston with him. As they were walking
down a trail leading to the back of the store, Johnson knocked
Elizabeth down, covered her mouth, pulled her pants to the side, and
raped her. He threatened to kill her if she ever told anyone. In
1983, Johnson was convicted of sexual assault in Travis County and
was sentenced to five years in prison. He confessed to raping
numerous women in Houston and Austin after his release from prison.
When he drove a cab, he stated that he would pick up prostitutes and
take them out to the country, rape them, and leave them there,
naked. Theresa Lewis testified that Johnson picked her up in his cab
in 1986. She got into the backseat, but Johnson insisted that she
sit in the front seat. When he asked her to have sex with him in
exchange for $20, she refused and told him she was not a whore. This
made him so angry that he pulled over, grabbed her by the neck and
began choking her. When she fought back, he struck her in the face
with his fist, and then raped her. He was convicted for that crime
in 1987, and sentenced to five years in prison. Johnson then met
Dora Ann Moseley, a prostitute, who became his wife. They moved to
Austin in 1991 and had children together. Johnson once beat her
so badly that he claims he would have killed her if the police had
not been called. She filed a police report a couple of weeks later,
after he beat her again. Johnson spent six months in jail for that
beating. Johnson confessed that in the summer of 1994, he met a girl
on 11th Street in Austin. They smoked crack and drank, and when she
refused to have sex with him, he beat her. He said that she pulled
out a razor and cut him on the left side of his neck and that he
then bashed her head in and stomped on her. He then claimed that he
took her head and gave himself oral sex before having “regular” sex
with her. He left her dead body behind a drug store on 11th Street.
Johnson confessed that he then raped a woman named Amy on top of a
hill across from the Austin police station. He then raped a girl
named Eva. When Eva tried to steal his crack cocaine, he grabbed her
by the hair, smashed her head into a rock, and then raped her. He
said that Eva ran away, yelling and screaming. Shortly before
Christmas in 1994, Johnson confessed that he lured a girl into a
graveyard in exchange for crack cocaine, and that he raped her three
or four times and “slapped her around.” He returned to Houston at
the end of December 1994. In February 1995, Johnson sexually
assaulted Debra Jenkins, his brother’s common-law wife’s
sister-in-law. She testified that he grabbed her by the throat,
threw her onto a bed, and began choking her. He cut the crotch of
her pajamas with a pair of scissors, and raped her twice.
On March
27, 1995, a citizen found the badly decomposed body of a female in
her thirties, face-down in a water-filled gully near some railroad
tracks. The victim had sustained numerous lacerations on her face,
as well as severe injuries to her mouth, and there was evidence of
manual strangulation. Johnson confessed that he raped and killed
this woman, whose identity had not been determined as of the time of
Johnson’s trial. He said he met her at a crack house and offered her
some crack cocaine in exchange for sex. She tried to leave after he
refused to give her more crack until she had sex with him, so he
grabbed her by the throat and hair and threw her to the ground. She
grabbed a rock and hit him on the head and he became angry and
banged her head on the railroad track. After she passed out, he
sexually assaulted her, then dragged her to the gully and left her
there. The jury also heard his confession that, three days later, he
killed another woman. He said that he took her to a warehouse to
smoke some crack cocaine. He became angry when she smoked his crack
but refused to have sex with him, so he grabbed her by the neck and
threw her down on the ground and sexually assaulted her while he
choked her. He sexually assaulted her again later, and they smoked
some more crack. When she jumped up, he caught her by the hair. When
she kept fighting, he banged her head on the pavement until she
became unconscious. The evidence of his brutal rapes and murders
seemed endless. On April 28, 1995, the partially clothed body of a
female was found underneath a highway overpass in Houston. She had
sustained massive head injuries, including a fractured skull and
cheekbone, and a large chunk of concrete with blood all over it was
found near her head. The autopsy revealed that she died from a
crushed head due to blunt trauma and asphyxia due to strangulation.
The marking on her throat was consistent with someone placing his
foot on her throat and stepping down. Johnson confessed that he
killed this woman, who had not been identified as of the time of his
trial. They smoked crack cocaine together and he became angry when
she refused to have sex with him. She hit him with a wine bottle and
he grabbed her and swung her down to the ground. He grabbed her neck
and banged her head on a rock. After she quit fighting, he sexually
assaulted her, then hit her head with a rock and left. Finally,
Angela Morris testified that on May 5, 1995, Johnson grabbed her by
the neck as she was walking down the street. He took her down a
driveway, struck her, threatened to kill her, and raped her while
holding a knife in his hand. He then tied her up with rags and left.
The defense had ordered a mental health evaluation of Johnson, but
decided not to use the testimony of the expert because it would have
been "severely detrimental" to their case. The jury returned a
recommendation of a death sentence after deliberating for only one
hour and fifteen minutes. Previously, Johnson had been sent to
prison in May of 1978 after being convicted of burglary of a vehicle
and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. He was released
on mandatory supervision in August of 1979 and finished his
supervision in January 1981. In December of 1983, he was sent to
prison again for a five year sentence on a sexual assault charge,
and was released a year and a half later. In May of 1987, Johnson
was again sentenced to 5 years on another sexual assault charge and
released again on mandatory supervision only 10 months later.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 12, 2009 |
Alabama |
Rhonda Hardin |
Danny
Bradley |
executed |
On
January 24, 1983, twelve-year-old Rhonda Hardin and her younger
brother, Gary "Bubba" Hardin, were left in the care of their
stepfather, Danny Joe Bradley. The children's mother, Judy Bradley,
had been hospitalized for more than one week. The children normally
slept in one bedroom of the residence and Danny Joe Bradley and Mrs.
Bradley in another. On the night of January 24, 1983, Jimmy Isaac,
Johnny Bishop, and Dianne Mobley went to the Bradley home where they
saw Rhonda and Bubba together with Danny Joe Bradley. When Bishop,
Mobley, and Isaac left the Bradley home at approximately 8:00 p.m.,
Rhonda was watching television with Bubba and Bradley. Rhonda was
lying on the couch, having taken some medicine earlier in the
evening. She asked Bubba to wake her if she fell asleep so that she
could move to the bedroom. When Bubba decided to go to bed, Bradley
told him not to wake Rhonda but to leave her on the couch. Bradley
also told Bubba to go to sleep in the room normally occupied by Mr.
and Mrs. Bradley instead of his own bedroom. At approximately 11:30
p.m., Bradley arrived at the home of his brother-in-law, Robert
Roland. Roland testified that Bradley arrived driving his automobile
and that he was "upset" and "acted funny." Roland testified that
Bradley "talked loud and acted like he was nervous and all, which I
had never seen him do before." Bradley's father-in-law, Ed Bennett,
testified that Bradley came to his house at approximately midnight
and told him that Rhonda was gone. Bradley's next-door neighbor,
Phillip Manus, testified that at approximately 12:50 a.m., Bradley
appeared at his home. Manus testified that Bradley told him that he
and Rhonda had argued over some pills Rhonda wanted to take. He
claimed that he had fallen asleep and when he awoke, Rhonda was
missing. Bradley then said "[l]et me run over to Rhonda's grandma's
house and I'll be back in a few minutes." Bradley returned ten or
fifteen minutes later. Manus suggested that they walk to the
hospital to tell Judy Bradley that Rhonda was missing. Manus
testified that Bradley wanted to go to the hospital rather than
report Rhonda's disappearance to the police. Manus and Bradley
waited at the hospital for one and one-half hours before they were
able to enter Mrs. Bradley's room. Throughout that period of time,
Manus tried to persuade Bradley to go to the police station to
report that Rhonda was missing. When the men eventually saw Mrs.
Bradley, she told Danny Joe Bradley to report Rhonda's disappearance
to the police. Manus and Bradley went to the police station where
Bradley told Officer Ricky Doyle that Rhonda was missing. Bradley
also told Officer Doyle that he and Rhonda had argued earlier in the
evening and that she had left the house sometime around 11:00 or
11:30 p.m. Bradley claimed that he had fallen asleep and that when
he awoke, Rhonda was gone. He stated that he left the house at 11:30
p.m. to go to his neighbor's house to look for Rhonda. Bradley
specifically indicated that he had not left the house until he began
looking for Rhonda and that he went to the Manus home when he
learned that Rhonda was missing. After talking with Officer Doyle,
Bradley and Manus returned to Manus's apartment. At approximately
7:30 a.m. on January 25, 1983, Rhonda's body was found in a wooded
area less than six-tenths of a mile from Bradley's apartment.
Rhonda's body was dressed in a pair of maroon-colored corduroy
pants, a short-sleeved red knit shirt, green, white, brown, and
purple striped leg warmers, a bra, and a blue windbreaker. Rhonda's
tennis shoes were tied in single knots. Several members of her
family testified that she always tied her shoes in double knots.
Within ninety minutes after Rhonda's body was discovered, two
plainclothes officers from the Piedmont Police Department arrived at
Bradley's residence. The officers had neither an arrest warrant nor
probable cause. Although the government contends that Bradley was
not placed under arrest at that time, Bradley claims that he was
told he was under arrest for suspicion of murder, handcuffed, placed
in a police vehicle, and taken to the Police Station, where an
interrogation began at around 9:30 a.m. Bradley was in the custody
of the Piedmont Police from that time until approximately 4:00 a.m.
on the following morning. During this period of almost nineteen
hours, the officers read Bradley his Miranda rights and questioned
him. Bradley told the police that he had discovered Rhonda missing
at approximately 11:20 or 11:25 p.m. and had gone to Phillip Manus's
house in search of her. He also told officers that he had not left
the apartment until he began his search for Rhonda. In addition to
giving a statement, Bradley executed a consent-to-search form
authorizing the police to search his residence and his automobile,
submitted to fingernail scraping, and was transported to and from
Birmingham, Alabama. While in Birmingham, he submitted to a
polygraph test and blood and saliva tests, and gave his clothing to
the authorities. Although Bradley cooperated with the police in
their investigation during this time period, he claims that he did
so because the police clearly indicated to him that he would remain
in police custody unless he cooperated. After obtaining the
consent-to-search form, the police searched his residence and his
automobile, seizing several items of physical evidence. Among the
seized items of evidence were a pillowcase, a damp blue towel from a
bathroom closet, the living room light switch plate cover, a red,
white, and blue sheet from the children's bedroom, a white "heavy"
sheet from the washing machine, and fiber samples from the trunk of
Bradley's automobile. Prior to the trial, the court denied Bradley's
two motions to suppress this evidence. At trial, the State presented
testimony that, contrary to Bradley's statements to police on both
January 24 and January 25, 1983, Police Officer Bruce Murphy had
seen Bradley in his car at 9:30 p.m. in the area where Rhonda's body
was discovered. Officer Murphy, who had known Bradley for more than
twenty years, positively identified him. The State's forensic
evidence demonstrated that Bradley's fingernail scrapings matched
the red, white, and blue sheet taken from the children's bedroom,
the fibers from the leg warmers found on Rhonda's body, and the
cotton from the pants Rhonda was wearing on January 24, 1983. The
State also proved that fibers found in the trunk of Danny Joe
Bradley's car matched the fibers from Rhonda's clothing. A
pathologist testified that Rhonda's body had "evidence of
trauma-that is, bruises and abrasions on her neck." She had seven
wounds on her neck; the largest was an abrasion over her Adam's
apple. The pathologist testified that he had taken swab and
substance smears from Rhonda's mouth, rectum, and vagina. He also
removed the gastric contents from Rhonda's stomach and turned them
over to the toxicologist. An expert in forensic serology testified
that Danny Joe Bradley and Rhonda Hardin were of type O blood.
Bradley is a non-secretor of the H-antigen. Rhonda was a secretor.
The serology expert testified that the H-antigen was not present in
the semen taken from the rectal swab of Rhonda. The rectum does not
produce secretions or H-antigens. On the inside of Rhonda's pants, a
stain containing a mixture of fecal-semen was found with spermatozoa
present. The pillowcase found in the bathroom revealed high levels
of seminal plasma and spermatozoa consistent with the type O blood
group. There were small blood stains on the pillowcase mixed with
saliva. These stains were also consistent with an O blood group. The
red, white, and blue sheet on the bed in the children's bedroom
contained a four by two and one-half inch stain which included
spermatozoa. The white blanket which had been placed in the washing
machine also had two large stains consistent with fecal-semen. In
both stains, spermatozoa was present and no H-antigens were
detected. A combination of semen and sperm with the H-antigen was
found on the blue towel located in the bathroom. Although the
written report indicated that the blue towel contained a fecal-semen
stain containing the H-antigen, the expert testified at trial that
her analysis revealed that the towel contained a vaginal-semen stain
not a fecal-semen stain and that the word fecal instead of vaginal
had been essentially a scriveners' error. She testified that because
the blue towel contained a vaginal semen stain, the H-antigen
secretions could have come from Rhonda's vaginal secretions. The
serologist testified that the low level of H-antigen was consistent
with a female secretor because the H-antigen is present in low
levels in the vagina. The mattress cover contained a number of
seminal stains. At trial, Bradley's sister-in-law also testified
that a day after Rhonda's funeral she heard Bradley say "I know deep
down in my heart that I done it," and Bradley's stepson, Bubba
Hardin, testified that Bradley had frequently rendered the children
unconscious by squeezing their necks. Bradley testified in his own
defense. He explained his inconsistent statements to police by
suggesting that he had left his home at the time he was observed by
Officer Murphy, because he had intended to steal a car, remove its
motor, and sell it. He claimed that Gary Hardin, the father of Bubba
and Rhonda, had asked him to obtain such a motor. Hardin testified
that he had made no such request. The jury returned a verdict of
guilty of capital murder on counts one and three of the indictment.
These counts charged murder during the commission of a rape or
sodomy in the first degree. The same jury deliberated in the
punishment phase and recommended twelve to zero that Bradley be
sentenced to death. |
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 14, 2009 |
California |
Vanessa Iberri, 12
|
Thomas Edwards |
Died in prison |
|
Thomas
Francis Edwards was sentenced to death for the 1981 murder of a
12-year-old girl who was camping with her mother Marsha and the
attempted murder of Vanessa's best friend in a campground east of
San Juan Capistrano. More than 27 years since the murder, Edwards
has died a natural death at age 65. Edwards, suffering from lung
cancer, had been moved from San Quentin to the California Medical
Facility in Vacaville for hospice care in December, according to
California Department of Corrections officials. Edwards was a gun
enthusiast and expert marksman who worked at a shooting range.
On and saw Vanessa Iberi and Kelly Cartier, both 12 years old,
walking together in the Blue Jay campground east of San Juan
Capistrano. The girls were heading to an area where they had planned
to have a creek-side picnic with Vanessa's mother. Edwards, who did
not know the girls, followed them in his truck. Kelly later said
that they noticed the man and saw him turn around and pass them
again before driving out of sight around a bend in the road. He
waited for them at a remote spot then drove up next to them before
stopping and calling out "Girls!" When they turned toward his call,
he then he shot them both in the head. He shot Vanessa between the
eyes with a .22 Ruger automatic pistol. Kelly, startled by the sound
of the gunshot, flinched and was merely grazed in the forehead by
the second shot, saving her life. Vanessa died two days later.
Within seconds of shooting the girls, Edwards, 37 at the time, fled.
With the help of Kelly's eyewitness account and information from
other campers who arrive on the horrible scene within seconds,
Edwards was tracked down in his home state of Maryland just over a
week later. As a teenager and young adult, Edwards had spent over a
dozen years in a correctional facility for sociopaths in Maryland.
Psychiatric records showed that Edwards had a fetish for long hair,
but there was never a clear explanation for why he targeted these
girls. Once arrested, Edwards confessed. "I don't know why I shot
those two little girls," he said to a jailer in Baltimore. "I am as
guilty as sin." At the time of Edwards's death, Vanessa would have
been 40 years old if she had survived. Vanessa's father Joe had
campaigned tirelessly for the execution to take place.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 19, 2009 |
Virginia |
Ricky
Lee Timbrook, 32 |
Edward
Bell |
executed |
|
On
the evening of October 29, 1999, Sergeant Ricky Lee Timbrook and two
probation and parole officers were working together in a program
known as Community Oriented Probation and Parole Services. One
aspect of Sergeant Timbrook's responsibilities was to assist the
probation officers in making home visits to individuals on probation
or parole. On that particular evening, these three individuals were
patrolling in an unmarked car in Winchester and were, among other
things, searching for Gerrad Wiley, who was wanted for violating the
terms of his probation. The officers went to Wiley's residence on
Woodstock Lane in Winchester several times that evening to no avail.
Just before midnight, when they returned to Wiley's residence for
the sixth time, they saw an individual standing in a grassy area
between a trash dumpster and an apartment building. As one of the
probation officers and Sergeant Timbrook exited the vehicle and
approached that individual, who was later identified as Daniel
Charles Spitler, another person, who had "dipped behind in the
shadows," began running away. Sergeant Timbrook pursued that
individual while calling for assistance on his radio. Spitler
identified the individual who ran from Sergeant Timbrook as Edward
Bell. Spitler testified that, on the evening in question, he was in
the area of Woodstock Lane for the purpose of obtaining cocaine from
Wiley. After no one answered his knock on the door of Wiley's
residence, Spitler started walking down a nearby alley where
he encountered Bell. Spitler did not tell Bell that he wanted
cocaine, but, according to Spitler, Bell "put his hands on me like
to pat me down to check and see if I had a wire on." During that
encounter, Sergeant Timbrook and the two probation officers arrived
in the unmarked vehicle. When the vehicle's headlights illuminated
Spitler and Bell, Spitler started walking toward the headlights, but
Bell stepped into the shadows of a building. Spitler identified
Sergeant Timbrook as one of the individuals who emerged from the
vehicle. According to Spitler, Bell then started running away and
Sergeant Timbrook chased after him, yelling "We have one running.
Stop." Spitler lost sight of Bell and Sergeant Timbrook when they
ran behind a building, but Spitler testified that he heard a shot
soon thereafter. Sergeant Timbrook chased Bell along several streets
and down an alley between two houses on Piccadilly Street. These
houses were separated by a fence approximately two or three feet in
height. As Sergeant Timbrook started to climb over the fence, a shot
rang out. A police officer, Robert L. Bower, who had responded to
Sergeant Timbrook's radio call for assistance, described the
incident in this manner: As Sergeant Timbrook started to cross over,
I took my eyes off of him, and directed it toward the subject. I
noticed it stopped. And, I saw a, what appeared to be a left
shoulder as it stopped. All I could was . . . it was like a black
material. . . . As soon as I saw it stop, I looked back at Timbrook
to say something, at which time I heard the shot. And, I saw
Timbrook falling. Sergeant Timbrook's body was found lying on the
ground with his feet close to the fence and his upper torso leaning
against a wall. His gun was still in its holster. Sergeant Timbrook
was transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead.
The cause of death was a single gunshot wound above his right eye,
caused by a bullet which was fired from a distance of between six
and eighteen inches. Brad Triplett, one of the probation officers
who had been patrolling with Sergeant Timbrook that evening, ran in
a parallel direction during part of Sergeant Timbrook's pursuit of
Bell. At one street intersection, he saw Sergeant Timbrook running
after the "same dark-dressed figure" who had originally fled from
Sergeant Timbrook. Triplett described that person's clothing as a
"dark black type of jumpsuit, nylon material," with "reflective like
stripes on the jacket." Several times during the pursuit, Triplett
heard Sergeant Timbrook yelling, "Stop running. Police." He also
heard the gunshot. The police searched the area for the suspect
throughout the night by securing a perimeter around the neighborhood
where the shooting had occurred and by using a helicopter equipped
with a heat-sensitive "Forward Looking Infrared" camera and a
spotlight. At one point during the search, Officer Brian King
spotted an individual lying on the back steps of a house located on
Piccadilly Street. King stated that the person was wearing a dark
colored jacket with reflective strips on the sleeves that "lit up
like a Christmas tree" when he shined his flashlight on the
individual. The person then stood up and disappeared behind a bush.
Emily Marlene Williams, who lived at the house, testified that she
heard the gunshot on the evening in question and about five minutes
later heard a "crash" in the basement of her house. After she told
the police about the noise in her basement, the police evacuated her
and her family from their home. The following morning, the police
discovered Bell, a Jamaican national, hiding in a coal bin in the
basement of the Williams' residence. He was wearing a "LUGZ" black
nylon jacket and a black beret cap with a gold pin. The jacket had
reflective stripes on the sleeves. Spitler identified both of these
items of clothing as those that Bell had been wearing on the evening
when Sergeant Timbrook was shot. Before Bell was transported from
the Williams' residence to the police department, a gunshot residue
test was administered to Bell's hands and the recovered particles
were subsequently identified as gunshot primer residue. During a
search of the backyard of the Williams' residence the day after Bell
was apprehended, a deputy sheriff found a pearl-handled, Smith and
Wesson .38 Special double action revolver. The gun was located under
the edge of a porch on the Williams' house and was covered with
leaves and twigs. Forensic testing established that this handgun
fired the bullet that killed Sergeant Timbrook. Forensic testing of
DNA that was recovered by swabbing the grips, butt, trigger, and
trigger guard of this revolver could not eliminate Bell as a
co-contributor of that DNA, which was consistent with a mixture of
DNA from at least three individuals. When questioned by the police
after his arrest, Bell admitted that he had been on Woodstock Lane
when "a white guy" allegedly began bothering him for information.
Bell said that when a car drove up and a man got out of the car, he
"was scared" and ran. He said he did not know who was chasing him or
why, and that when he heard a shot fired, he hid in the basement of
the house where he was later discovered. Bell denied having a gun.
However, while Bell was confined in jail awaiting trial, he told
another inmate that he shot Sergeant Timbrook, threw the gun
underneath a porch, and then broke into a house and changed clothes
in the basement. Justin William Jones testified that, around nine
o'clock on the evening of the shooting, he saw Bell in the vicinity
of Piccadilly Street. According to Jones, Bell showed him a revolver
and asked if Jones knew of anyone who wanted to buy a weapon. Jones
identified the pearl-handled, .38 caliber revolver introduced at
trial as the same weapon that Bell had shown him. The evening
Sergeant Timbrook was shot was not the first encounter between
Timbrook and Bell. Sergeant Timbrook had arrested Bell for carrying
a concealed weapon in May 1997. The following year, in September
1998, Sergeant Timbrook was present during the execution of an
Immigration and Naturalization Service order to detain Bell. Eight
months later, Sergeant Timbrook assisted in executing a search
warrant at Bell's home. Bell was present during that search. In the
summer of 1999, one of Bell's friends heard Bell state, as Sergeant
Timbrook drove by in a vehicle, "Somebody needs to bust a cap in his
ass." Another of Bell's acquaintances testified that she heard Bell
say that he would like to see Sergeant Timbrook dead, and that if he
ever came face to face with Sergeant Timbrook, he would shoot
Sergeant Timbrook in the head because he knew that Sergeant Timbrook
wore a bullet-proof vest. During the penalty phase, the Commonwealth
presented evidence regarding Bell's criminal history. Several law
enforcement officers testified about incidents involving Bell. A
police officer from Jamaica provided information about Bell's
commission of the crimes of assault and destruction of property in
1985. In 1997, an officer with the Winchester Police Department
found a .38 caliber handgun concealed in the trunk of a car being
driven by Bell. The serial number of the gun had been filed off. An
officer with the West Virginia State Police stated that when he
stopped Bell for speeding in 1999, Bell gave him a false name. When
the officer started to arrest Bell and place him in handcuffs, Bell
ran away into a cornfield. Another West Virginia law enforcement
officer found five .38 caliber rounds of ammunition on Bell's person
during a "stop and frisk" in 1999. Finally, two employees of the
jail where Bell was confined while awaiting trial testified that
Bell had threatened them. Another witness, Billy Jo Swartz,
testified about an incident in 1997 when Bell grabbed her head and
slammed it into his car. He also held a gun to her head. During the
same incident, Bell got into a fight with his pregnant girlfriend
and knocked her to the ground. Swartz further stated that she had
seen Bell with illegal drugs. Other witnesses likewise testified
about buying illegal drugs from Bell. Members of Sergeant Timbrook's
family described their relationship with him and the effect that his
death has had on the family. His wife was pregnant with their first
child when Sergeant Timbrook was killed. The only evidence that Bell
introduced during the penalty phase was from his sister and father.
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 19, 2009 |
Alabama |
James A.
Caldwell, 50 |
Richard Gaddy |
Died in prison |
|
Richard Eugene Gaddy, 47, sentenced to death for the
December 9, 1989 stabbing death of a teacher from Birmingham's
Huffman High School, died on Thursday, February 19, 2009 from liver
disease. James A. Caldwell was fifty years of age at the time of his
death, lived alone in the East Lake part of Birmingham, Jefferson
County, and was employed as a math teacher at Huffman High School.
Another teacher, a coach and Driver's Education instructor, last saw
Jim alive on Friday, December 8, 1989. On the following Wednesday,
the coach and the school principal became suspicious about Jim
Caldwell's absence from work and went to his apartment, having
called the Birmingham Police Department for an officer to meet them
at the home. Jim Caldwell was observed through the mail slot in the
door lying in a pool of blood behind the door. A forensic
pathologist described multiple slash wounds and stab wounds to Jim's
body, in his head, neck, left ear, chest, abdomen and palm of hand.
He also described several abrasions. The doctor detailed nineteen
slash and stab wounds as well as detailing evidence of 'severe
strangulation,' obvious from 'pinpoint' hemorrhaging in the eyes and
stated that strangulation was not the cause of death, that Jim was
alive when he was being stabbed as evidenced by the bleeding from
the wounds. According to the pathologist, toxicology revealed no
evidence of drug or alcohol ingestion by Jim Caldwell and there was
no evidence of a sexual assault. A deputy sheriff stopped Gaddy and
two other males in Jim Caldwell's automobile on December 13, 1989,
in Saluda County, South Carolina. Gaddy was seated in the backseat
of the automobile. A BOLO (be on the lookout) had been issued
regarding the vehicle because of two robberies committed in South
Carolina. Gaddy was video-taped in the commission of one of the
robberies. Prior to being brought to Alabama for the trial of the
capital murder of Jim Caldwell, Gaddy entered guilty pleas to two
robbery offenses in South Carolina. Gaddy's statement to police is
listed here. "December 14, 1989 - 'In the last of October when
I left Augusta, Georgia hitchhiking, I was headed nowhere
particular, I headed for Atlanta, Georgia. I knew it was big enough
to make money and to roll people. I stayed in Atlanta, under a
bridge one night. I couldn't find anybody who had anything to roll
in Atlanta. So I hitchhiked on down I-20 to Birmingham. I slept
outside and I got sick. I went to the Mission when I got to Alabama.
I got up with James Sanders. He pulled up and asked me if I wanted
to work. I went to work with him at the carnival. I worked one day.
That was October 31, 1989. I worked at the race track with his wife.
She would get me a visitor's pass. I also helped them around the
house. On the 8th of December, James and his wife asked me to leave.
I left on Friday and I slept in the park. On Saturday the 9th of
December, 1989, I fooled around, I just bought time until dark until
I could find somebody to roll and have the cover of night. I got up
on 59 or I-20 hitchhiking, a man, a white man, stopped and I got in
the car. He asked me if I wanted to get something to eat. I knew
then that he was gay. I knew then that it would be easy to get to
his house to roll him and to rob him. This was about 6:00 to 6:30.
He told me his name was Jim. We went to his house. He turned on the
TV and I was cold and I sat by the heater. About 7:30 he started
acting like he was going to freak out or something. He was laying on
the couch and I was sitting on the couch. His bed was right across
from the couch. He was wearing a white T-shirt, black or navy pants,
I was wearing blue jeans and insulated coveralls and a red, white
and blue jersey shirt and tennis shoes that night. I got up and I
moved toward him and reached behind my back for the knife that I had
concealed. It was a paring type knife with a 4
1/2 to 5 inch blade. I had filed the blade to a double edge
knife and made it a combat point. He grabbed my hand as soon as I
came around with the knife. He was lying down and started to sit up.
I moved with an upward thrust, stabbing him in the chest. He grabbed
my hand and I stabbed again, but I am not sure I stabbed him that
time. Jim got the knife and we were fighting. He came up off the
couch and I got around behind him in the fight. Jim said, 'Just
leave.' As I tried to get the knife from him he got to the door and
got it unlocked but not opened. During that struggle from the bed to
the couch to the door, my right hand was cut between the thumb and
index finger. My left hand got a puncture in the palm. I reached in
my back pocket and got a piece of white nylon rope a quarter inch
thick about 40 inches long. I wrapped it around Jim's neck. Jim got
the knife between the rope and his neck and cut the rope in two. I
had some of the rope wrapped around my hand. I let some of it unwrap
from my left hand, reached around and grabbed the loose end with my
right hand pulled it back around Jim's neck and choked him until he
was either dead or passed out. I took the knife and stabbed him
three more times in the throat below the Adam's Apple. I let him lay
for awhile and searched the rest of the house. The house was junkie.
I stole old coins, collections, paper money, loose change, gold and
silver rings and a pair of binoculars. I went back over to Jim and I
took a small gold ring off his right pinky finger, a nine diamond
cluster ring. Then I got his wallet, car keys and money about $60 in
his pocket and later I found more cash in the wallet and money hid
in the old paper money collection. I put it all in a sack, a plastic
sack. I turned out all the lights in the house. Before I turned off
the lights, I washed the blood off of my hands. When I went out of
the house I locked the front door with the key so no one could
easily find him. I went out to the car and got in and drove off. I
went back and picked up my clothes where I had them stashed. I
headed for Augusta, Georgia. When I crossed into Georgia on I-20 I
rolled the window down on the passenger's side and threw the knife
out while I was still moving. When I got to Atlanta, Georgia, I
stopped and changed my clothes, I put the clothes I took off in a
trash bag and put them back into the car. Every 10 to 15 miles I
threw out pieces of clothing out the car until they were gone. I was
about 5 miles out of Atlanta and threw clothing out the passenger
window of the car. When I got back to Bath, I rented a motel room so
I could go through the stuff to see what I had, I separated it into
what I thought was valuable and what was not valuable. On Monday I
started selling some of it. Monday, I went over to a friend's house,
Tony. I asked him if he would take some rings and money collection
to the pawn shop to sell it. He said he could try to sell the rings
at the pawn shop. He didn't know anything about the coins but he
would try some coin shops. Tony did not know anything about the car
being stolen or the murder. We went to the Gordon Military Pawn Shop
on Broad Street. Tony and I went in and had him look at all the
rings which was about 25 or 30. Some had settings and some were just
settings with the setting removed. Some of them were silver. The man
said they did not buy silver. There were only 2 rings he wanted. By
this time I had read the papers in the car and I knew the man's name
was James Caldwell. One of the rings that the man bought at the pawn
shop was the ring I took off of Jim's pinky finger. A nine diamond
cluster ring. The other was a solid 10K gold ring with the setting
removed. The rest of the rings I sold for $5 or $10 or traded for
Crack on Hwy 278 in Aiken County, I believe. I traded the binoculars
for crack rock. We took paper money to a coin shop in Augusta and
sold some of it for $60. I still had some paper money and the coins
and stamp collection when I was arrested in Saluda County, December
13, 1989.'"
|
|
Date of scheduled execution |
State |
Victim name |
Inmate name |
Status |
|
February 20, 2009 |
South
Carolina |
Linda Williams,
39
Shaun Williams, 12 |
Luke Williams,
III |
executed |
|
At approximately 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday,
June 19, 1991, the bodies of Linda Williams and Shaun Williams were
discovered inside the family van in a forest in Edgefield County,
South Carolina, approximately six miles from their home near
Augusta, Georgia. The front bumper of the van was against a tree,
and fire had partially damaged the vehicle. The investigators
detected a strong odor of gasoline and found several metal cans
containing gasoline inside the van. Linda was discovered in the
driver’s seat, which was positioned so far back that her feet could
not reach the pedals, and Shaun was seated in the front passenger
seat. Blood was found on a piece of PVC pipe on the van’s
floorboard. Linda was dressed in a gray t-shirt, gray sweatpants
pulled down to her upper thigh, light pink socks, nylon panties, and
she was not wearing a bra or shoes. Shaun was also shoeless and was
wearing a t-shirt and sweatpants. Linda suffered a black eye, a
contusion on the bridge of her nose, contusions on her left forearm,
and abrasions on her left shoulder. These injuries were consistent
with having been caused by a human fist. The autopsy revealed that
Linda’s cause of death was blunt head trauma due to a beating.
Shaun
suffered a bruise to his forehead, as well as abrasions to his chin,
back, and right side of his neck. His cause of death was
asphyxiation due to manual strangulation. Wounds created by the fire
were postmortem. Although the deaths occurred within the same time
frame, a specific time of death was not determined. At trial,
several friends of Linda testified that she always dressed neatly
and would not go out in public dressed in a t-shirt without a bra.
Additionally, they stated that because Linda was short in stature,
she always positioned the driver’s seat of the van close to the
steering wheel. One friend stated that she last spoke with Linda by
telephone at 2:50 p.m. on June 18, 1991. A neighbor testified that
on June 19, 1991, a car drove into the driveway at Williams’ home
between 1:00 and 2:00 a.m. At approximately 7:00 a.m. on June 19,
1991, Linda’s van was not parked in the driveway. A bath towel and
Shaun’s tennis shoes with blood stains on them were found at
Williams’ home. In addition, Williams’ right hand was severely
bruised and swollen — this injury was consistent with having
occurred on June 19th. Williams told a friend that on the day of the
homicides, Linda and Shaun were planning to go shopping at Columbia
Mall in Columbia, South Carolina. Prior to receiving the autopsy
results, Williams informed the friend that Linda had been beaten to
death, and Shaun had been strangled with a plastic wire wrap similar
to wire wrap Shaun had in his bedroom. When asked if he killed Linda
and Shaun, Williams did not respond. Williams and Linda were
experiencing significant marital and financial difficulties.
Neighbors and friends stated that they frequently overheard Williams
and Linda engaging in hostile arguments. One neighbor testified that
she heard a "loud thump" during one of the arguments. In addition,
Williams and Linda had declared bankruptcy, and foreclosure
proceedings had been initiated against their home. Williams had
substantially increased life insurance benefits on Linda and Shaun
during May of 1991, designating himself as beneficiary. On May 7,
1991, Williams upgraded existing policies with Allstate Insurance
Company to include auto related death benefits in the amounts of
$100,000 for Linda and $20,000 for Shaun. Williams forged Linda’s
name on the enrollment form. After their deaths, Williams made
claims under two Allstate policies in the amounts of $200,000 on
Linda and $45,000 on Shaun. Williams also took out new life
insurance policies for Linda and Shaun with State Farm Insurance
Company effective May 30, 1991, providing Linda with death benefit
insurance in the amount of $250,000 and Shaun with $25,000 in death
benefit insurance. Williams applied for $500,000 in death benefit
insurance for Linda; however, until the policy was approved a binder
limited the amount of coverage to $250,000. Williams indicated on
the claims forms that Linda and Shaun had died in Edgefield County,
South Carolina. Shaun was an orphan from El Salvador who had been
adopted by the Williams couple, and was an honor student in the 7th
grade at the time of his murder. Linda's mother Dora Azrak said that
from the moment she heard the news of her daughter’s death she knew
who was responsible. “I said 'Luke killed her. Call the police and
tell them Luke killed her.' That's what I told my son. I knew. I
knew. I knew,” she said. “I can't get over it. I loved my daughter
very, very much and I miss her every day.”
|
Page visited
times since 10/5/08
Page last updated
02/20/09 |